MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3092753222

MMR variants & HNPCC susceptibility

2006· article· en· W3092753222 on OpenAlexaff
Sheron Perera, Bharati Bapat

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMLH1BiologyDNA mismatch repairGeneticsLynch syndromeGermline mutationGeneGermlineMissense mutationPhenotypeMutagenesisMutationColorectal cancerCancer researchCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3343 Germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes predispose to a common form of colorectal cancer known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) or Lynch Syndrome. Approximately 25% of sequence alterations in the MMR genes are of uncertain pathogenic relevance, which poses difficulties for predictive testing programs offered to familial colorectal cancer patients. We hypothesize that missense alterations in distinct domains of the MMR proteins likely affect their function(s) to varying degrees and this likely contributes to the variable disease phenotype observed in HNPCC. Hence this project aims to characterize the pathogenicity associated with a panel of variants of unknown functional significance, and to elucidate the mechanisms by which they exert their effects. We have selected a panel of unclassified variants identified in HNPCC patients based on their presence in functional domains, evolutionary status and pathogenicity as predicted by computational databases. The variants chosen in hMLH1 include: I19F, A128S, R265C, K618A and L749Q. These variants were created in plasmids containing wild type MLH1 cDNA by site-directed mutagenesis, verified by sequencing and transiently transfected into the colon cancer cell line HCT116, which is deficient for hMLH1. Western blotting assays were carried out to ascertain the expression levels of the proteins. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments were performed to determine if these putative mutations disrupt interactions with partner proteins. In order to differentiate between endogenous and transfected mRNA, we have sub-cloned the wild type and variant MLH1 cDNAs into tagged expression constructs, which will be used in mRNA stability assays following Actinomycin D treatment. Cyto-nuclear fractionation experiments are in progress to ascertain if the variants affect the localization of the MMR proteins. Results indicate that the variants R265C and K618A significantly decrease the overall expression of MLH1 compared to the wild type vector. I19F, A128S and L749Q however, affect the temporal expression profile of MLH1, indicating a possible decrease in the stability of the protein. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that the ability of the MLH1 L749Q variant to interact with its cognate partner PMS2 is compromised. This is an interesting observation as this variant is located just adjacent to the previously defined PMS2 interaction domain. Preliminary results from cyto-nuclear fractionation studies show no difference between the localization of the variants R265C, L749Q and wild type MLH1. Our results indicate that the majority of unclassified variants investigated in this study perturb the expression and/ or interaction of the MMR proteins. In addition to its clinical utility, these studies will also provide a better understanding of the MMR proteins and the manner in which they contribute to colorectal cancer progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→