MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A sedimentary ancient DNA approach to elucidate the Labrador Sea paleoceanography over the last ~130,000 years

2020· article· en· W3092853029 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stijn De Schepper, Jessica Louise Ray, Lisa Griem, Nicolas Van Nieuwenhove, Danielle Grant, Kristine Steinsland, Katrine Sandnes Skaar, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAncient DNAPaleoceanographyOceanographyDinoflagellateHoloceneMarine isotope stagePaleontologyGeologyGlacial periodBiologyInterglacial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) records from the marine environment are at present a curiosity and their utility in paleoceanographic research is not yet fully explored. Nevertheless, a few studies indicate that this ecogenetic repository represents an untapped source of new information with which paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic variability can be more deeply explored. We have generated a sedaDNA record from a 19.6 m-long sediment core in the Labrador Sea (Eirik Drift, south of Greenland). The record extends from the early Holocene to Marine Isotope Stage 5 (ca. 130,000 years ago), and we characterized several important climatic transitions in this time interval using stable isotope stratigraphy, ice-rafted detritus counts, and dinoflagellate cyst census counts. The primary goal of this investigation was to query the sedaDNA record for a biological indication of the last and penultimate deglaciation, as well as Heinrich events identified between 65,000 and 25,000 years ago. Our metabarcoding strategy targeted a broad diversity of eukaryotic organisms through amplification of the V7 hypervariable region of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene. The preliminary sedaDNA results indicate that eukaryote ancient DNA is present in all samples investigated, including those dating back to Marine Isotope Stage 5. Furthermore, we identified abundance shifts in Protaspidae (cercozoa), diatoms, dinoflagellates, and marine stramenopiles (amongst others) that may be linked to changes in paleoceanography during the last two deglaciations as well as Heinrich events (HE3, HE4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies→French-language works237,207→