Bibliographic record
Abstract
NDER THE traditional choice-of-law rule, the law of the situs governs the rights and liabilities of the parties.This rule still prevails in some states,' though the decade of the sixties witnessed a vigorous assault upon this time-honored proposition.In a landmark case, 2 William Jackson of Rochester, New York, owned an automobile garaged, licensed and insured in New York.Mr. Jackson, his wife and Miss Georgia Babcock left Rochester in his car on a Friday for a weekend in Canada.While Mr. Jackson was driving in Ontario, he lost control of his car, went off the road and crashed into a stone wall, as a result of which Miss Babcock was injured.Miss Babcock commenced an action in New York against Mr. Jackson to recover damages for her injuries.At the time of the accident, Ontario had a statute which prohibited a guest in an automobile from recovering from the host-owner or driver.The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground of the Ontario statute.His motion was granted.The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division which affirmed the dismissal with a strong dissenting opinion.On appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, the order of dismissal was reversed.Judge Fuld, for the majority of the Court of Appeals, rejected the traditional "vested rights theory" of conflict of laws because it failed to take into consideration underlying policy factors.In lieu of this traditional theory, he adopted the "dominant interests" principle, be-* MR.AUSUBEL received his B.A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".