Responses of low Arctic tundra plant species to experimental manipulations: Differences between abiotic and biotic factors and between short- and long-term effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change in arctic tundra is projected to affect air temperature, snow depth, soil fertility, and caribou herbivory, which may alter plant community composition by shifting niche space to favor particular species’ life history strategies. We report responses of a Canadian mesic birch hummock tundra plant community to a range of manipulative experiments (greenhouse warming, fertilization, snow fence, and caribou exclosure treatments). Aboveground biomass of each plant species was measured in the same permanent 1 m2 areas using the point frame method in 2005, 2011, and 2017. Although the greenhouse treatment had few effects on individual species, total vascular plant community biomass was enhanced between 2011 and 2017. Furthermore, species’ biomass across all control plots was stable from 2005 to 2011 but increased significantly from 2011 to 2017, with air temperatures also warmer over that same period. Species responded to high-level nitrogen and high-level nitrogen and phosphorus combined additions, with deciduous shrubs and graminoids increasing and evergreen shrubs decreasing. The snow fences and caribou exclosures had little effect on species biomass. Although vegetation greening trends have been reported in arctic environments that are primarily influenced by maritime climate, our study is one of the first to provide plot-based evidence of recent plant biomass increases in the low Arctic’s continental interior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".