MétaCan
Menu
← all works

An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Optogenetics

2020· article· en· 130 citations· W3092961487 on OpenAlex· 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.027

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
none
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
Genre
Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score
0.119
Threshold uncertainty score
0.576
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread
0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

The record

Venue
Neuron
Topic
Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Field
Neuroscience
Canadian institutions
Western University
Funders
Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNational Eye InstituteNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchEuropean Research CouncilDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyNational Institutes of HealthYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthKU LeuvenEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentChinese Academy of SciencesLeibniz-GemeinschaftCharles E. Kaufman FoundationMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentStavros Niarchos FoundationMcKnight FoundationWellcome TrustCalifornia Department of Fish and GameNational Science FoundationFight for SightJapan Science and Technology AgencyHoward Hughes Medical InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaResearch to Prevent BlindnessSimons FoundationMedical Research Council
Keywords
OptogeneticsPrimateNeuroscienceOpen scienceListing (finance)Resource (disambiguation)PsychologyComputer scienceCognitive scienceBusiness
Has abstract in OpenAlex
no