MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092967345 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02355

Label-Free Ultrasensitive and Environment-Friendly Immunosensor Based on a Silica Optical Fiber for the Determination of Ciprofloxacin in Wastewater Samples

2020· article· en· W3092967345 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rafaela Silva Lamarca, Douglas F. Franco, Marcelo Nalin, Paulo Clairmont Feitosa de Lima Gomes, Younès Messaddeq

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversité Laval
KeywordsWastewaterDetection limitChemistryEffluentChromatographyContaminationSewage treatmentDilutionWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging contaminants, including pharmaceutical compounds, are receiving research attention as a result of their widespread presence in effluents and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The antibiotic ciprofloxacin (CIP) is extensively employed to treat infections in animal and human medicine. Both CIP and its metabolites are common contaminants found in WWTPs. In this study, a label-free ultrasensitive U-bent optical fiber-based immunosensor for the determination of CIP in wastewater samples was developed using the properties of the conducting polymer polyaniline (PANI). The anti-CIP immunoglobulin G (IgG) was deposited on a silica optical fiber surface previously functionalized with PANI. Scanning electron microscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy were used to investigate the surface of the immunosensor. The analysis of CIP in wastewater was performed without the use of an organic solvent or sample preparation steps, with only the sample dilution in saline buffer (pH = 7.4). The linear range for CIP was from 0.01 to 10,000 ng L–1. The detection limit was 3.30 × 10–3 ng L–1 and the quantification limit was 0.01 ng L–1. The immunosensor provided a high average recovery of 91% after spiking wastewater samples with CIP at a concentration of 9,100 ng L–1. The method was applied in triplicate to wastewater samples from Quebec (Canada), obtaining concentrations of 549 and 267 ng L–1. A comparison with a reference method showed no significant difference (t-test at 95% confidence). The new technique developed is selective, allowing a quantitative analysis of CIP in wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207