MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093020824 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.10.009

The Canadian Women’s Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women—Chapter 2: Scope of the Problem

2020· review· en· W3093020824 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shahin Jaffer, Heather J.A. Foulds, Monica Parry, Christine A. Gonsalves, Christine Pacheco, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Kerri A. Mullen, Cindy Ying Yin Yip, Sharon L. Mulvagh, Colleen M. Norris

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta HealthAlberta Health ServicesHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of OttawaInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversity of AlbertaCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité LavalUniversity of SaskatchewanLaurentian UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute FoundationUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsScope (computer science)AllianceEpidemiologyMedicineDiseaseAtlas (anatomy)GerontologyIntensive care medicineComputer sciencePathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: This Atlas chapter summarizes the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women in Canada, discusses sex and gender disparities, and examines the intersectionality between sex and other factors that play a prominent role in CVD outcomes in women, including gender, indigenous identity, ethnic variation, disability, and socioeconomic status. R ESUM EContexte : Ce chapitre de l'Atlas condense l' epid emiologie des maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV) chez les femmes au Canada, aborde les disparit es entre les sexes et les genres, et examine l'interrelation entre le sexe et d'autres facteurs qui jouent un rôle important dans l' emergence des MCV chez les femmes, notamment le genre, l'identit eCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of premature death in women in Canada. 1 Beyond sex-unique CVD risk factors in women, several traditional risk factors have a greater morbidity and mortality impact in women compared to men.Rates of CVD vary substantially among provinces and within regions of Canada.This Atlas chapter aims to do the following: summarize the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in women in Canada; discuss sex and gender disparities; and examine the intersectionality between sex and other disparities that play a prominent role in CVD outcomes in women, including indigenous identity, ethnic variation, disability, and socioeconomic status (SES).Figure 1 summarizes the key concepts presented in this chapter. Demographics Cardiovascular wellness indicators/traditional risk factorsMost Canadian women have at least one risk factor for CVD. 2 Although the burden of CVD has been improving over time, outcomes for women, particularly those aged < 55 years, have stagnated.3 Women are more likely than men to die in the year following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to experience death, heart failure, or stroke within 5 years after acute MI. 4,5 CJC Open 3 (2021) 1e11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.018
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207