MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093039332

Thermal expansivity and elastic properties of the lithospheric mantle: results from mineral physics of composites

2005· article· en· W3093039332 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Carlos Afonso, G. Ranalli, Manel Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueAGU Spring Meeting Abstracts · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithosphereMantle (geology)GeologyArcheanThermal expansionGeophysicsThermalPetrologySeismologyGeochemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elastic properties and the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the lithospheric mantle are important parameters that affect the results of lithospheric modelling. However, there is still no consensus on which values are the most appropriate to model the lithosphere, and various average values are used for lithospheres of different age, thermal state, and composition. We present an integrated approach to calculate the elastic properties and the CTE of mantle rocks, based on the mineral physics of composites and considering the spatial heterogeneity of the lithospheric mantle. The method considers the dependence of parameters on pressure and temperature, following a procedure based on an extension of the shear-lag model and thermal expansivity systematics. Representative values are calculated for three lithospheric domains: (a) Archean lithosphere, (b) Phanerozoic continental lithosphere, and (c) oceanic lithosphere. For the case of Archean lithosphere, values of CTE between (3.04 and 3.11) × 10 −5 K −1 are found to be suitable for modelling, and a constant depth-derivative for P-waves ∂Vp/∂z ∼ 2.30 × 10 −3 s −1 is estimated. Results for Phanerozoic lithosphere show that no single average value of CTE can be used in modelling. Values range non-linearly between (3.25 and 3.47) × 10 −5 K −1 at pressures equivalent to depths of 25 and 100 km, respectively. The P-wave velocity variation with depth exhibits a decrease in the range of 25–40 km, followed by almost a constant value of ∼8.08 km s −1 between 40 and 60 km, and a systematic increase with a depth-derivative ∂Vp/∂z ∼ 1.12 × 10 −3 s −1 from 60 km downwards. The variation in the CTE is largest in oceanic lithosphere. In young plates (20 Ma), values of the CTE range non-linearly from (3.25 to 3.82) × 10 −5 K −1 at pressures equivalent to depths of 10 and 50 km, respectively. In old oceanic lithosphere ( ∼100 Ma), the CTE is slightly smaller, showing values in the range of (3.0–3.7) × 10 −5 K −1 at 10 and 80 km, respectively, giving a typical average value of ∼3.45 × 10 −5 K −1 . P-wave velocity in young oceanic lithosphere decreases from ∼8.14 to 8.0 km s −1 in the first 30 km, then follows a nearly constant path downwards. In old oceanic lithosphere, on the other hand, a systematic reduction from ∼8.2 to 8.1 km s −1 in P-wave velocities is predicted as depth increases from 10 to 80 km. The effects of heterogeneities in CTE and elastic parameters are particularly noticeable in Archean lithosphere, where difference in predicted elevations and geoid heights can reach values of ≥300 and ∼6 m, respectively, when compared to standard models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGU Spring Meeting AbstractsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207