A Nuclear Stress Pathway that Parallels Cytoplasmic Stress Granule Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress adaptation is exploited by cancer cells to survive and proliferate under adverse conditions. Survival pathways induced by stress are thus highly promising therapeutic targets. One key pathway involves formation of cytoplasmic stress granules, which regulate the location, stability, and translation of specific mRNAs. Here, we describe a transcriptional stress response that is triggered by similar stressors and characterized by accumulation of RepoMan (cell division cycle associated 2) at nuclear stress foci (nucSF). Formation of these structures is reversible, and they are distinct from known nuclear organelles and stress bodies. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed accumulation of heterochromatic markers, and increased association of RepoMan with the adenylate cyclase 2 (ADCY2) gene locus in stressed cells accompanied reduced levels of ADCY2 mRNA and protein. Quantitative comparison of the RepoMan interactome in stressed vs. unstressed cells identified condensin II as a nucSF factor, suggesting their functional association in the establishment and/or maintenance of these facultative heterochromatic domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".