MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093128814 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.08.019

Significant Increase of Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Renal Failure Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020· review· en· W3093128814 on OpenAlex
Lianmin Luo, Chenglin Xiao, Qian Xiang, Zhiguo Zhu, Yangzhou Liu, Jiamin Wang, Yihan Deng, Zhigang Zhao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineRenal replacement therapyMeta-analysisInternal medicineCochrane LibraryRenal functionPublication biasSexual functionCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that sexual dysfunction (SD) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), and starting renal replacement therapy may even increase it. However, SD is an infrequently reported problem in these treated patients. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of SD among patients with CRF undergoing renal replacement therapy, by a meta-analysis method. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for all studies assessing sexual function in patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy from January 2000 to April 2020. Relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs was used for analysis to assess the risk of SD in patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy. The cross-sectional study quality methodology checklist was used for the cross-sectional study. The methodologic quality of the case-control and cohort studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were pooled for the random-effect model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess potential bias. The Begg and Egger tests were used for publication bias analysis. OUTCOMES: The prevalence of SD among patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy was summarized using pooled RR and 95% CI. RESULTS: = 86.1%, P = .000). Estimates of the total effects were generally consistent in the sensitivity analysis. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy had a significantly increased risk of SD, which suggests that clinicians should evaluate sexual function, when managing patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the first study to explore the prevalence of SD among patients with CRF undergoing renal replacement therapy based on all available epidemiologic studies. However, all included studies were an observational design, which may downgrade this evidence. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SD is significantly increased among patients with CRF receiving renal replacement therapy. More research studies are warranted to clarify the relationship. Luo L, Xiao C, Xiang Q, et al. Significant Increase of Sexual Dysfunction in Patients With Renal Failure Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2020;17:2382-2393.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it