Non-equilibrium growth and twist of cross-linked collagen fibrils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lysyl oxidase (LOX) enzyme that catalyses cross-link formation during the assembly of collagen fibrils in vivo is too large to diffuse within assembled fibrils, and so is incompatible with a fully equilibrium mechanism for fibril formation. We propose that enzymatic cross-links are formed at the fibril surface during the growth of collagen fibrils; as a consequence no significant reorientation of previously cross-linked collagen molecules occurs inside collagen fibrils during fibril growth in vivo. By imposing local equilibrium only at the fibril surface, we develop a coarse-grained quantitative model of in vivo fibril structure that incorporates a double-twist orientation of collagen molecules and a periodic D-band density modulation along the fibril axis. Radial growth is controlled by the concentration of available collagen molecules outside the fibril. In contrast with earlier equilibrium models of fibril structure, we find that all fibrils can exhibit a core-shell structure that is controlled only by the fibril radius. At small radii a core is developed with a linear double-twist structure as a function of radius. Within the core the double-twist structure is largely independent of the D-band. Within the shell at larger radii, the structure approaches a constant twist configuration that is strongly coupled with the D-band. We suggest a stable radius control mechanism that corneal fibrils can exploit near the edge of the linear core regime; while larger tendon fibrils use a cruder version of growth control that does not select a preferred radius.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".