MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

De “curiosa” à “parteira de verdade”: compreensão, assimilação e desenvolvimento do partejar tradicional

2020· article· pt· W3093219479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRACS Revista Eletrônica de Humanidades do Curso de Ciências Sociais da UNIFAP · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and sociocultural dynamics
Canadian institutionsIamgold (Canada)
FundersUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco
KeywordsSpan (engineering)Style (visual arts)Life spanFontHumanitiesArtMedicineGerontologyLiteratureVisual artsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Esse artigo trata sobre o aprendizado do partejar tradicional por Parteiras Tradicionais do Município de Santana, no Estado do Amapá. O<span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;"> objetivo é</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="pt-BR">descrever como ocorre o processo de aprendizagem das técnicas utilizadas nos atendimentos prestados por parteiras tradicionais de Santana às mulheres gestantes. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">A pesquisa ocorreu no período de 2016 a 2018, sendo que a</span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="pt-BR"> primeira fase tratou do levantamento bibliográfico acerca da temática e das teorias antropológicas que serviram de base para o estudo </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">e a</span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="pt-BR"> etapa subsequente consistiu no trabalho de campo de caráter etnográfico.</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> Por meio</span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="pt-BR"> da observação participante acompanhei seus atendimentos e dediquei atenção às falas e comportamentos das minhas interlocutoras, observando atentamente seu cotidiano e tomando nota sobre suas memórias e técnicas do partejar</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">. D</span></span><span style="font-family: Times new roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="pt-BR">emonstro que o processo de compreensão, assimilação e desenvolvimento dos conhecimentos tradicionais do partejar podem ser pensados por meio da educação da atenção proposta por Ingold.</span></span></span></p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it