De “curiosa” à “parteira de verdade”: compreensão, assimilação e desenvolvimento do partejar tradicional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esse artigo trata sobre o aprendizado do partejar tradicional por Parteiras Tradicionais do Município de Santana, no Estado do Amapá. O objetivo édescrever como ocorre o processo de aprendizagem das técnicas utilizadas nos atendimentos prestados por parteiras tradicionais de Santana às mulheres gestantes. A pesquisa ocorreu no período de 2016 a 2018, sendo que a primeira fase tratou do levantamento bibliográfico acerca da temática e das teorias antropológicas que serviram de base para o estudo e a etapa subsequente consistiu no trabalho de campo de caráter etnográfico. Por meio da observação participante acompanhei seus atendimentos e dediquei atenção às falas e comportamentos das minhas interlocutoras, observando atentamente seu cotidiano e tomando nota sobre suas memórias e técnicas do partejar. Demonstro que o processo de compreensão, assimilação e desenvolvimento dos conhecimentos tradicionais do partejar podem ser pensados por meio da educação da atenção proposta por Ingold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".