MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093394690 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.507036

Comparing the Infection Biology of Plasmodiophora brassicae in Clubroot Susceptible and Resistant Hosts and Non-hosts

2020· article· en· W3093394690 on OpenAlexafffund
Lìjiāng Liú, Li Qin, Xiaohui Cheng, Yi Zhang, Li Xu, Fan Liu, Chaobo Tong, Junyan Huang, Shengyi Liu, Yangdou Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgricultural Science and Technology Innovation ProgramNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Warwick
KeywordsClubrootBiologyHost (biology)ZoosporeBrassicaBrassica rapaInoculationBrassicaceaeBotanyMicrobiologySporeHorticultureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential infection biology of P. brassicae in resistant hosts and nonhosts is still not completely understood. Clubroot resistance assay on European Clubroot Differentials (ECD) set revealed that ECD10 (Brassica napus) and ECD4 (B. rapa) show a complete resistance to the tested P. brassicae isolate in contrast to highly susceptible hosts Westar (B. napus) and ECD5 (B. rapa). Previously, we used fluorescent probe-based confocal microscopy (FCM) to refine the life cycle P. brassicae and indicate the important time points during its infection in Arabidopsis. Here, we used FCM to systematically investigate the infection of P. brassicae in two resistant host species ECD10 and ECD4 and two nonhost crops wheat and barley at each indicated time points, compared with two susceptible hosts Westar and ECD4. We found that P. brassicae can initiate the primary infection and produce uninucleate primary plasmodia in both resistant hosts and nonhosts just like susceptible hosts at 2 days post inoculation (dpi). Importantly, P. brassicae can develop into zoosporangia and secondary zoospores, and release secondary zoospores from zoosporangia in resistant hosts at 7 dpi, comparable to susceptible hosts. However, during the secondary infection, no secondary plasmodium was detected in the cortical cells of both resistant hosts in contrast to massive secondary plasmodia present in the cortex tissue leading to root swelling in two susceptible hosts at 15 dpi. In both nonhost crops, only uninucleate primary plasmodia were observed throughout roots at 7 and 15 dpi. Quantitative PCR based on DNA revealed that the biomass of P. brassicae has no significant increase from 2 dpi in nonhost plants and from 7 dpi in resistant host plants, compared to the huge biomass increase in susceptible host plants from 2 to 25 dpi. Our study reveals that the primary infection in the root epidermis and the secondary infection in the cortex tissue are respectively blocked in nonhosts and resistant hosts, contributing to understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying clubroot nonhost and host resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207