MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093494804 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3033055

Joint Hybrid Precoder and Combiner for Wideband Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems

2020· article· en· W3093494804 on OpenAlexaff
Talha Mir, Ubaid Abbasi, Ali Raza, Syed Mudassir Hussain, Usama Mir

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsNorthwestern Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingComputer scienceMIMOWidebandTurboAlgorithmBase stationSpectral efficiencyJoint (building)Bandwidth (computing)Extremely high frequencyElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid precoding and combining is a key technique to provide an appropriate antenna gain in millimeter-wave (mmWave) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. In wideband mmWave channels, the analog precoder and combiner is designed in the time domain and remain unchanged over the whole bandwidth. In contrast, digital precoders and combiners are optimized on a per-subcarrier basis which makes the resultant problem very difficult. To solve this problem, we combine the well-known turbo-equalizer with the tabu-search (TS)-algorithm developed in artificial intelligence and propose TS-based joint hybrid precoding and combining scheme to intelligently search the near-optimum pair of hybrid precoder and combiner. Specifically, our scheme consists of two key steps. At first, a base station (BS) and a mobile station (MS) develop the turbo-like (TL)-joint search by using the idea of iterative information exchange between them. Then, to find out the near-optimum pair of hybrid precoder and combiner in each iteration of the TL-joint search, the TS-algorithm is employed. Simulation results are shown to verify the significant sum-rate performance of the proposed solution with low-complexity compared to some existing solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207