MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessing arsenic in human toenail clippings using portable X-ray fluorescence

2020· article· en· W3093512990 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Radiation and Isotopes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New BrunswickDalhousie UniversityMount Allison University
FundersHealth CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPartenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
KeywordsArsenicRadiochemistryX-rayFluorescenceX-ray fluorescenceChemistryEnvironmental chemistryPhysicsOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arsenic is a toxic metalloid which has been associated with a wide range of health effects in humans including skin abnormalities and an elevated risk of skin, bladder, kidney, and lung cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The measurement of arsenic concentration in nail clippings is often used in population studies as an indicator of arsenic exposure. Portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is an emerging technique for measuring arsenic in nail clippings. In the current study, single toenail clippings from 60 Atlantic Canadian participants were assessed for arsenic using a new portable XRF approach. A mono-energetic portable XRF system using doubly curved crystal optics was used to measure each clipping for a total of 900 s. Energy spectra from each clipping were analyzed for arsenic characteristic X-rays to provide a normalized arsenic signal. The same clippings were then analyzed for arsenic concentration using a "gold standard" method of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Nail clipping arsenic concentrations measured by ICP-MS ranged from 0.030 μg/g to 2.57 μg/g, with a median result of 0.14 μg/g. Portable XRF results for arsenic were compared against ICP-MS arsenic concentrations, with a linear equation of best fit determined between the two variables. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.77 was found from the 59 nail clippings returning an ICP-MS arsenic concentration above the limit of quantitation. When the comparison was limited to the 20 clippings having an XRF normalized signal at least twice as large as the associated uncertainty of measurement, the correlation coefficient was r = 0.89. With the selection of an arsenic concentration of 0.1 μg/g as a cut-off value between "exposed" and "non-exposed" individuals, the XRF method provided a test sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 81%. The corresponding positive predictive value was 88% and the negative predictive value was 65%. The portable XRF technique used in this study shows promise as a means of assessing arsenic concentration in toenail clippings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it