MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093585647 · doi:10.1089/fpd.2020.2851

Third-Generation Cephalosporin- and Tetracycline-Resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes from Metagenomes of Mink Feces and Feed

2020· article· en· W3093585647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Getahun E. Agga, Philip J. Silva, Randal S. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueFoodborne Pathogens and Disease · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMinkFecesTetRMicrobiologyTetracyclineEscherichia coliAntibiotic resistancePopulationAntimicrobialVeterinary medicineAntibioticsGeneGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American mink (Neovison vison) is a significant source of global fur production. Except for a few studies from Denmark and Canada reporting antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from clinical cases, studies from the general mink population are scarce and absent in the United States. Mink feces (n = 42) and feed (n = 8) samples obtained from a mink farm were cultured for the enumeration and detection of tetracycline-resistant (TETr)- and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (TGCr)-Escherichia coli. Isolates were characterized phenotypically for their resistance to other antibiotics and genotypically for resistance genes. TETrE. coli were detected from 98% of feces samples (mean concentration = 6 log10) and from 100% of feed samples (mean concentration = 3.2 logs). Among TETrE. coli isolates, 44% (n = 41) of fecal- and 50% (n = 8) of feed isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR; resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes), and 96% (n = 49) of TETr isolates were positive for tet(A) and/or tet(B). TGCrE. coli were detected from 95% of feces and 75% of feed samples with 78% (n = 40) of fecal isolates, and all six of the feed isolates were MDR. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of the TGCrE. coli isolates (n = 46) were positive for blaCMY-2; the remaining 35% were positive for blaCTX-M, with the blaCTX-M-14 being the predominant (75%, n = 16) variant detected. Metagenomic DNA was extracted directly from feces and feed samples, and it was tested for 84 antimicrobial resistance genes by using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array; selected genes were also quantified by droplet digital PCR. The genes detected from the fecal samples belonged mainly to five antimicrobial classes: macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin B (MLSB; 100% prevalence), TETs (88.1%), β-lactams (71.4%), aminoglycosides (66.7%), and fluoroquinolones (47.6%). β-Lactam, MLSB, and TET resistance genes were also detected from feed samples. Our study serves as a baseline for further studies and to streamline antimicrobial use in mink production in accordance with current regulations as in food animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoodborne Pathogens and DiseaseSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207