MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093608051 · doi:10.1088/2632-959x/abc2e3

Boron nitride-palladium nanostructured catalyst: efficient reduction of nitrobenzene derivatives in water

2020· article· en· W3093608051 on OpenAlexaff
Behnam Nayebi, Navid Rabiee, Behzad Nayebi, Mehdi Shahedi Asl, Seeram Ramakrishna, Ho Won Jang, Rajender S. Varma, Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsNitrobenzeneCatalysisBoron nitridePalladiumX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeTransmission electron microscopyChemical engineeringBoronNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Boron nitride (BN) supported palladium (Pd) nanostructured catalyst, as an alternative support for heterogeneous reduction of nitrobenzene derivatives, was prepared by a mild reduction of a Pd precursor in water. The structural characteristics and distribution of the synthesized Pd nanoparticles (NPs) on BN support were investigated by transmission electron microscopy, scanning transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy methods. The potential and efficiency of the BN supported Pd NPs as an active and stable nanostructured catalyst were verified in the reduction of nitroaromatics. Excellent yields of the corresponding aryl amines in water were obtained and due discussion were included about the catalytic activity of the synthesized catalyst. It was also indicated that the nanostructured catalyst can be recycled at least for six consecutive cycles in the reduction of nitrobenzene, without losing significant activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano ExpressSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207