MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S0703 Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Up to 6.8 Years of Safety Data From Global Clinical Trials

2020· article· en· W3093617046 on OpenAlexaff
William J. Sandborn, Julián Panés, Geert D’Haens, Bruce E. Sands, Remo Panaccione, Siew C. Ng, Thomas V. Jones, Nervin Lawendy, Nicole Kulisek, Rajiv Mundayat, Chinyu Su

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectUlcerative colitisIncidence (geometry)GastroenterologySurgeryRheumatoid arthritisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib were evaluated in randomized, placebo-controlled Phase (P)2 (NCT00787202) and P3 (NCT01465763; NCT01458951; NCT01458574) studies, and in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (NCT01470612) (1–3). We report updated tofacitinib safety analyses from the tofacitinib UC clinical program, with exposure up to 6.8 years. METHODS: Two cohorts were analyzed: P3 Maintenance (N = 592; patients [pts] receiving placebo, tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily [BID]) and Overall (N = 1,157; pts receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID in P2/P3/OLE studies; data as of May 2019, database not locked). Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; unique pts with events per 100 pt-years [PY] of exposure) were evaluated for adverse events (AEs) of special interest. Opportunistic infections (OIs), malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and gastrointestinal (GI) perforations were reviewed by independent adjudication committees. RESULTS: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety data are shown in the table. In the Overall Cohort, 1,157 pts received ≥ 1 dose of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID; most pts (N = 959, 83%) received an average dose of 10 mg BID. Median treatment duration was 623 (range 1–2,494) days (2,581.3 PY of exposure). IRs (95% confidence interval) for AEs of special interest were: deaths, 0.19 (0.06, 0.44); serious infections, 1.70 (1.24, 2.27); herpes zoster (non-serious and serious), 3.48 (2.79, 4.30); OIs, 1.07 (0.71, 1.55); malignancies (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), 0.75 (0.46, 1.16); NMSC, 0.73 (0.44, 1.13); MACE, 0.26 (0.11, 0.54); deep vein thrombosis, 0.04 (0.00, 0.21); pulmonary embolism, 0.15 (0.04, 0.38); GI perforations, 0.11 (0.02, 0.33). Results in the Overall Cohort as per the previous Nov 2017 data cut are presented for context (4). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of tofacitinib in pts with UC was manageable and consistent with that of other UC therapies incl. biologics. Overall, IRs for AEs of interest have generally remained stable in the tofacitinib UC clinical program over an extended period of time (up to 6.8 years).Table 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→