Structured Online Learning-based Control of Continuous-time Nonlinear Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model-based reinforcement learning techniques accelerate the learning task by employing a transition model to make predictions. In this paper, a model-based learning approach is presented that iteratively computes the optimal value function based on the most recent update of the model. Assuming a structured continuous-time model of the system in terms of a set of bases, we formulate an infinite horizon optimal control problem addressing a given control objective. The structure of the system along with a value function parameterized in the quadratic form provides a flexibility in analytically calculating an update rule for the parameters. Hence, a matrix differential equation of the parameters is obtained, where the solution is used to characterize the optimal feedback control in terms of the bases, at any time step. Moreover, the quadratic form of the value function suggests a compact way of updating the parameters that considerably decreases the computational complexity. Considering the state-dependency of the differential equation, we exploit the obtained framework as an online learning-based algorithm. In the numerical results, the presented algorithm is implemented on four nonlinear benchmark examples, where the regulation problem is successfully solved while an identified model of the system is obtained with a bounded prediction error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".