Acute hyperaminoacidemia does not suppress insulin-mediated glucose turnover in healthy young men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elevated circulating amino acids (AA) concentrations are purported to cause insulin resistance (IR) in humans. To quantify hyperaminoacidemia effects on insulin-mediated glucose turnover in healthy men, we performed 2-stage pancreatic clamps using octreotide with glucagon and growth hormone replacement. In the basal stage, insulin was infused to maintain euglycemia at postabsorptive levels. During the clamp stage, insulin was raised to postprandial levels, glycemia clamped at 5.5 mmol/L by glucose infusion, and branched-chain AA (BCAA) maintained at either postabsorptive (Hyper1; n = 8) or postprandial (Hyper2; n = 7) by AA infusion. Glucose turnover was measured by d-3-[3H]glucose dilution. Octreotide suppressed C-peptide; glucagon, growth hormone, and glycemia were maintained at postabsorptive levels throughout. Insulin did not differ at postabsorptive (72 ± 5 vs. 60 ± 5 pmol/L; Hyper1 vs. Hyper2) and increased to similar concentrations at basal (108 ± 11 vs. 106 ± 14) and clamp stages (551 ± 23 vs. 540 ± 25). Postabsorptive BCAA were maintained during Hyper1 and increased >2-fold (830 ± 26 µmol/L) during Hyper2. Endogenous glucose production was similarly suppressed (0.95 ± 0.16 vs. 1.37 ± 0.23 mg/kg lean body mass/min; Hyper1 vs. Hyper2) and basal glucose disposal (3.44 ± 0.12 vs. 3.67 ± 0.14) increased to similar levels (10.89 ± 0.56 vs. 11.11 ± 1.00) during the clamp. Thus, acute physiological elevation of AA for 3 h did not cause IR in healthy men. Novelty: A 2-step pancreatic clamp was used to quantify the effect of AA on insulin sensitivity in humans. Acute physiological elevation of circulating AA to postprandial levels does not cause IR in healthy men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".