A G protein-coupled receptor-like module regulates Cellulose Synthase secretion from the endomembrane system in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cellulose synthesis is essential for plant morphology, water transport and defense, and provides raw material for biomaterials and fuels. Cellulose is produced at the plasma membrane by Cellulose Synthase (CESA) protein complexes (CSCs). CSCs are assembled in the endomembrane system and then trafficked from the Golgi apparatus and trans -Golgi Network (TGN) to the plasma membrane. Since CESA enzymes are only active in the plasma membrane, control of CSC secretion is a critical step in the regulation of cellulose synthesis. However, the regulatory framework for CSC secretion is not clarified. In this study, we identify members of a family of seven transmembrane domain-containing proteins (7TMs) as important for cellulose production during cell wall integrity stress. 7TM proteins are often associated with guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G) protein signalling and mutants in several of the canonical G protein complex components phenocopied the 7tm mutant plants. Unexpectedly, the 7TM proteins localized to the Golgi apparatus/TGN where they interacted with the G protein complex. Here, the 7TMs and G proteins regulated CESA trafficking, but did not affect general protein secretion. Furthermore, during cell wall stress, 7TMs’ localization was biased towards small CESA-containing vesicles, specifically associated with CSC trafficking. Our results thus outline how a G protein-coupled module regulates CESA trafficking and reveal that defects in this process lead to exacerbated responses upon exposure to cell wall integrity stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".