MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093800784 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3033129

Privacy-Enhanced Data Fusion for COVID-19 Applications in Intelligent Internet of Medical Things

2020· article· en· W3093800784 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Lin, Sahil Garg, Jia Hu, Md. Jalil Piran, M. Shamim Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersDeanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
KeywordsComputer scienceHomomorphic encryptionThe InternetTask (project management)Information sensitivityEncryptionSensor fusionComputer securityInformation privacyData miningArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the worldwide large-scale outbreak of COVID-19, the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), as a new type of Internet of Things (IoT)-based intelligent medical system, is being used for COVID-19 prevention and detection. However, since the widespread use of IoMT will generate a large amount of sensitive information related to patients, it is becoming more and more important yet challenging to ensure data security and privacy of COVID-19 applications in IoMT. The leakage of private information during IoMT data fusion process will cause serious problems and affect people's willingness to contribute data in IoMT. To address these challenges, this article proposes a new privacy-enhanced data fusion strategy (PDFS). The proposed PDFS consists of four important components, i.e., sensitive task classification, task completion assessment, incentive mechanism-based task contract design, and homomorphic encryption-based data fusion. The extensive simulation experiments demonstrate that PDFS can achieve high task classification accuracy, task completion rate, task data reliability and task participation rate, and low average error rate, while improving the privacy protection for data fusion under COVID-19 application environments based on IoMT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207