MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093815982 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2020-0278

Optimizing degradation conditions of treatment of TATB explosive wastewater by γ-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles and UV synergistic degradation

2020· article· en· W3093815982 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaonan Liu, Yuedan Deng, Chaorong Zhang, Xueyuan Bai, Jinshan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsTATBChemistryDegradation (telecommunications)Explosive materialSuperparamagnetismHydrolysisNanoparticleWastewaterUltravioletChemical engineeringNuclear chemistrySewage treatmentOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the effect of superparamagnetic γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles and ultraviolet light (UV) synergistic degradation on the treatment of 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) explosive wastewater was studied. γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles were prepared by hydrolysis method and the degradation performance of TATB explosive wastewater was systematically studied with UV light assisted. The results showed that γ-Fe 2 O 3 magnetic nanoparticles have a low size distribution that ranged from 5 to 10 nm and possesses superparamagnetic properties. The optimized degradation condition was investigated and best degradation performance was obtained with the optimized conditions: the initial of pH = 3, UV illumination intensity (5 w/cm 2 ), reaction temperature (25 °C), initial total organic carbon concentration (4.025 mg/L) as well as reaction time (60 min). This work can offer a new idea to degrade the explosive wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207