MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093912291 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00346

Selective Carbon–Carbon Bond Cleavage of Cyclopropanols

2020· review· en· W3093912291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryCleavage (geology)Bond cleavageCarbon fibersReinforced carbon–carbonCarbon–carbon bondBondOrganic chemistryComposite numberCatalysisBusinessComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The carbon-carbon (C-C) bond cleavage of cyclopropanols is a wide area of research with much current activity. This review highlights new developments in this area over the past two decades. A summary is made of the three main reactivity modes, namely, homoenolate chemistry, β-keto radical chemistry, and acid-catalyzed ring-opening, as well as all other methods for the C-C bond cleavage and functionalization of cyclopropanols, including base-mediated ring-opening, metal-catalyzed C-C insertions and eliminations, oxidative fragmentation using hypervalent iodine reagents, reactions of donor-acceptor cyclopropanols, and pericylic reactions. Emphasis is placed on the synthetic utility of cyclopropanols and related derivatives, which have emerged as unique three-carbon synthons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it