Ultrasound examination predicts 6‐month progression in carpal tunnel syndrome patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a peripheral neuropathy resulting from chronic median nerve compression. Chronic compression leads to neurological changes that are quantified through nerve conduction studies (NCS). Although NCS represents the gold standard in CTS assessment, they provide limited prognostic value. Several studies have identified ultrasound as a tool in diagnosing and potentially predicting the progression of CTS in patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of ultrasound examination in CTS patients. Twenty patients recruited at their first visit with the neurologist completed two NCS and ultrasound examinations approximately 6 months apart. Ultrasound examination consisted of B‐mode, pulse‐wave Doppler and colour Doppler ultrasound videos and images to quantify median nerve cross‐sectional area, intraneural blood flow velocity in three wrist postures (15° flexion, neutral, and 30° extension), and displacement of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon and the adjacent subsynovial connective tissue (SSCT) of the middle finger during repetitive finger flexion‐extension cycles. A questionnaire was administered to assess the work‐relatedness of CTS. Linear regression analyses revealed that intraneural blood flow velocity ( R 2 = 0.36, p = .03), assessed in wrist flexion, and relative FDS‐SSCT displacement ( R 2 = 0.27, p = .04) and shear strain index ( R 2 = 0.28, p = .04) were significant predictors of nerve sensory and motor changes at 6 months. Results suggest the possibility of using a battery of ultrasound measures as viable markers to predict median nerve functional changes within 6 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".