Pozzolanic reactivity of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes and implication of their incorporation on the chloride permeability of concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well understood that the partial replacement of portland cement with pozzolans in sufficient proportions results in improved long-term performance of concrete. However, dwindling availability of the most widely used pozzolan in the construction industry, fly ash, is forecast due to the termination of coal-fired electricity power stations around the world, necessitating the exploration of alternative pozzolans. Experimental investigations are conducted to study the performance of traditional pozzolans such as fly ash, silica fume and natural pozzolans (metakaolin, pumice, perlite and lassenite) together with novel pozzolans, including ground glasses (high-alkali and low-alkali), and ground bottom ash. Twenty-one concrete mixtures are examined for compressive strength, electrical conductivity, electrical resistivity, chloride permeability, and chloride migration coefficient. The reactivity of pozzolans studied is also determined in terms of compressive strength in lime-pozzolan mortar using a modified lime-reactivity test method. Many of the materials tested demonstrate the potential to be used in place of fly ash. However, a wide variation in the performance of these materials is evident which highlights the need for a reliable test to determine the level of reactivity of a pozzolan. The results indicate that the 7-day strength in the modified lime-reactivity test provides a good indication of the pozzolanic reactivity of the material and of how the material can be expected to contribute to the strength and permeability of concrete. The use of electrical resistivity as an indicator of the performance of pozzolans in terms of strength development and chloride penetration resistance when used to partially replace portland cement in concrete is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".