MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S0683 Absence of Bowel Urgency Is Associated With Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Mirikizumab

2020· article· en· W3094196452 on OpenAlexaff
Marla C. Dubinsky, Remo Panaccione, James D. Lewis, Bruce E. Sands, Toshifumi Hibi∥, Scott D. Lee, April N. Naegeli, Mingyang Shan, Linden Green, Nathan Morris, Vipin Arora, Alison Potts-Bleakman, Ruth M. Belin, Simon Travis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineLogistic regressionClinical trialPlaceboAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Bowel urgency is one of the most common yet often overlooked symptoms experienced by patients with UC (1). Mirikizumab (miri), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the p19 subunit of IL-23, demonstrated efficacy (2), was well-tolerated, and significantly reduced urgency (3) in a phase 2 randomized clinical trial in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Here we show the relationship between patient-reported urgency and improvements in measures of clinical efficacy. METHODS: Patients (N = 249) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive intravenous placebo, miri 50mg or 200mg with possibility of exposure-based dose increases, or fixed miri 600 mg every 4 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response (n = 106) at Week 12 were re-randomized 1:1 to double-blind maintenance treatment with miri 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 or 12 weeks and treated through Week 52. Analyses of the association between urgency and clinical efficacy at Weeks 12 and 52 were conducted by pooling treatment arms in the induction and maintenance periods, respectively. Absence of urgency was defined as reporting no urgency for the three consecutive days prior to each scheduled visit, regardless of urgency status at BL. Patients with missing urgency data were imputed as having experienced urgency at that visit. Clinical efficacy in patients with presence or absence of urgency was compared using logistic regression models adjusting for geographic region, prior biologic experience, age, and sex. RESULTS: As previously reported, miri significantly reduced urgency over 52 weeks of treatment (3). At Week 12 and Week 52, patients with absence of urgency had significantly higher rates of improvement on all clinical outcomes examined (clinical remission, clinical response, stool frequency (SF) remission, rectal bleeding (RB) remission, endoscopic remission, histologic remission, mucosal healing; see Table 1 for definitions and P values) compared to those with presence of urgency. CONCLUSION: Absence of urgency is strongly associated with improved clinical, endoscopic and histologic outcomes. These findings suggest that urgency may be a useful surrogate marker of disease activity and is a distinct symptom that is important to discuss with patients with UC.Table 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→