Learning Occupancy Function from Point Clouds for Surface Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Implicit function based surface reconstruction has been studied for a long time to recover 3D shapes from point clouds sampled from surfaces. Recently, Signed Distance Functions (SDFs) and Occupany Functions are adopted in learning-based shape reconstruction methods as implicit 3D shape representation. This paper proposes a novel method for learning occupancy functions from sparse point clouds and achieves better performance on challenging surface reconstruction tasks. Unlike the previous methods, which predict point occupancy with fully-connected multi-layer networks, we adapt the point cloud deep learning architecture, Point Convolution Neural Network (PCNN), to build our learning model. Specifically, we create a sampling operator and insert it into PCNN to continuously sample the feature space at the points where occupancy states need to be predicted. This method natively obtains point cloud data's geometric nature, and it's invariant to point permutation. Our occupancy function learning can be easily fit into procedures of point cloud up-sampling and surface reconstruction. Our experiments show state-of-the-art performance for reconstructing With ShapeNet dataset and demonstrate this method's well-generalization by testing it with McGill 3D dataset \cite{siddiqi2008retrieving}. Moreover, we find the learned occupancy function is relatively more rotation invariant than previous shape learning methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".