MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3094226597 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v46i10a08

Sentinel surveillance of Lyme disease risk in Canada, 2019: Results from the first year of the Canadian Lyme Sentinel Network (CaLSeN)

2020· article· en· W3094226597 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Camille Guillot, J Badcock, Katie M. Clow, Jennifer Cram, Shaun J. Dergousoff, Antonia Dibernardo, Michelle Evason, Erin Fraser, Eleni Galanis, Salima Gasmi, Greg J. German, Douglas T Howse, Claire M. Jardine, Emily Jenkins, Jules K. Koffi, Manisha A. Kulkarni, L. Robbin Lindsay, Genevieve Lumsden, Roman McKay, Muhammad Morshed, Douglas Munn, Mark P. Nelder, Joe R. Nocera, Marion Ripoche, Kateryn Rochon, Curtis Russell, Andreea M. Slatculescu, Benoit Talbot, Karine Thivierge, Maarten J. Voordouw, Catherine Bouchard, Patrick A. Leighton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health OntarioKingston Health Sciences CentreUniversity of OttawaHealth PEIUniversity of Prince Edward IslandPublic Health Agency of CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNova Scotia Health AuthorityBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphGovernment of New BrunswickUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersMinistère de la SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
KeywordsIxodes scapularisBorrelia burgdorferiLyme diseaseTickIxodesBabesiosisBorreliaBiologyVeterinary medicineVirologyMedicineIxodidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Lyme disease is an emerging vector-borne zoonotic disease of increasing public health importance in Canada.As part of its mandate, the Canadian Lyme Disease Research Network (CLyDRN) launched a pan-Canadian sentinel surveillance initiative, the Canadian Lyme Sentinel Network (CaLSeN), in 2019.Objectives: To create a standardized, national sentinel surveillance network providing a real-time portrait of the evolving environmental risk of Lyme disease in each province. Methods:A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach was used in the selection of sentinel regions.Within each sentinel region, a systematic drag sampling protocol was performed in selected sampling sites.Ticks collected during these active surveillance visits were identified to species, and Ixodes spp.ticks were tested for infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti and Powassan virus Results: In 2019, a total of 567 Ixodes spp.ticks (I.scapularis [n=550]; I. pacificus [n=10]; and I. angustus [n=7]) were collected in seven provinces: British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island.The highest mean tick densities (nymphs/100 m 2 ) were found in sentinel regions of Lunenburg (0.45), Montréal (0.43) and Granby (0.38).Overall, the Borrelia burgdorferi prevalence in ticks was 25.2% (0%-45.0%).One I. angustus nymph from British Columbia was positive for Babesia microti, a first for the province.The deer tick lineage of Powassan virus was detected in one adult I. scapularis in Nova Scotia.Conclusion: CaLSeN provides the first coordinated national active surveillance initiative for tick-borne disease in Canada.Through multidisciplinary collaborations between experts in each province, the pilot year was successful in establishing a baseline for Lyme disease risk across the country, allowing future trends to be detected and studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease Report→Same topicVector-borne infectious diseases→French-language works237,207→