Richardson’s ground squirrel (Urocitellus richardsonii) alarm call receivers experience an auditory continuity illusion.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Auditory continuity illusions are perceptual illusions in which receivers perceive an auditory signal as continuous when part of the signal has been removed or obfuscated by a louder noise. Richardson's ground squirrels (Urocitellus richardsonii) communicate alarm acoustically in noisy natural settings. Thus, we tested whether they experience an auditory continuity illusion by presenting free-living squirrels with repeated whistle alarm calls within which every second syllable remained unmanipulated, was partially obfuscated by relatively brief (25 ms) bursts of white noise, or partially obfuscated by longer duration (100 ms) white noise bursts. Field playbacks of alarm calls with brief white noise bursts failed to elicit increased vigilance from receivers relative to unmanipulated calls, whereas calls with longer white noise bursts elicited increased vigilance relative to the other 2 call types. As with previous empirical demonstrations of the auditory continuity illusion in vertebrates, relatively short obfuscating noise resulted in receivers perceiving each syllable as a whole, while longer obfuscating noise caused receivers to perceive the beginning and end of each manipulated syllable as 2 distinct syllables, increasing the perceived syllable repetition rate. These results reveal that Richardson's ground squirrels experience an auditory continuity illusion allowing the extraction of the rate of syllable repetition from conspecific repeated alarm calls in the face of short duration environmental noise. Selection has acted upon receivers to refine the cognitive mechanisms underlying signal perception, facilitating the extraction of information masked by environmental noise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".