S0682 Absence of Bowel Urgency Is Associated With Significantly Improved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Related Quality of Life in a Phase 2 Trial of Mirikizumab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mirikizumab (miri), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the p19 subunit of IL-23, demonstrated efficacy and was well-tolerated in a phase 2 randomized clinical trial in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Bowel urgency is one of the most bothersome symptoms experienced by patients with UC and is closely tied to health-related quality of life (QoL). Here we show the relationship between patient-reported urgency and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores. METHODS: Patients (N = 247) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive intravenous placebo, miri 50 mg or 200 mg with possibility of exposure-based dose increases, or fixed miri 600 mg every 4 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response at Week 12 (decrease in 9-point Mayo score ≥2 points and ≥35% from baseline [BL], and either a decrease in rectal bleeding [RB] subscore ≥1 or RB subscore of 0 or 1; n = 106) were re-randomized 1:1 to double-blind maintenance treatment with miri 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 or 12 weeks and were treated through Week 52. Absence of urgency at Weeks 12 and 52 was defined as having no urgency for the three consecutive days prior to each scheduled visit, regardless of urgency status at BL. Patients lacking urgency data were imputed as having experienced urgency at that visit. The mean change from BL (Week 0) in IBDQ scores between patients with absence or presence of urgency at Weeks 12 and 52 was determined using analysis of covariance models. RESULTS: As previously reported, miri significantly reduced urgency over 52 weeks of treatment (1). In this analysis, total IBDQ score was significantly higher in patients with absence of urgency compared to those with presence of urgency at weeks 12 and 52. [LSM (SE)]: Week 12, 179.2 (3.6) absence, 150.5 (3.2) presence, P < 0.0001; Week 52, 186.0 (3.91) absence, 163.1 (4.35) presence, P < 0.0001. A similar pattern was observed for the 4 IBDQ subscores and corresponded to percent changes from BL (% ΔBL) that were more than two times greater in patients with absence of urgency compared to patients with presence of urgency (Table 1). CONCLUSION: In patients with absence of urgency at Weeks 12 and 52, Qol as measured by IBDQ was significantly improved compared to those with urgency. Our data demonstrate the significant negative impact of urgency on QoL in patients with UC.Table 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".