MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3094421459 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbeff

A Large Massive Quiescent Galaxy Sample at z ∼ 1.2

2020· article· en· W3094421459 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxyRedshiftBalmer seriesGalaxy formation and evolutionRedshift surveyElliptical galaxySample (material)Lenticular galaxySurface brightness fluctuation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we present a simple color–magnitude selection and obtain a large sample of 33,893 massive quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshifts (1 < z < 1.5). We choose the longest wavelength available in the Hyper-Supreme-Cam (HSC) deep survey, the Y band and i − Y color, to select the 4000 Å Balmer jump in passive galaxies to the highest redshift possible within the survey. With the rich multiwavelength data in the HSC deep fields, we then confirm that the selected galaxies are in the targeted redshift range of 1 < z < 1.5, lie in the passive region of the UVJ diagram, and have high stellar masses at log(M */M ⊙) > 10.5, with a median of log(M */M ⊙) = 11.0. A small fraction of our galaxies is also covered by the HST CANDELS. Morphological analysis in the observed H band shows that the majority of this subsample are early-type galaxies. As massive early-type galaxies trace the high-density regions in the large-scale structure in the universe, our study provides a quick and simple way to obtain a statistically significant sample of massive galaxies in a relatively narrow redshift range. Our sample is 7–20× larger at the massive end (log(M */M ⊙) > 10.5) than any existing samples obtained in previous surveys. This is a pioneer study, and the technique introduced here can be applied to a future wide-field survey to study large-scale structure and to identify high-density regions and clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→