Association of early skin breaks and neonatal thalamic maturation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Objective</h3> To test the hypothesis that a strategy of prolonged arterial line (AL) and central venous line (CVL) use is associated with reduced neonatal invasive procedures and improved growth of the thalamus in extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks9 gestation). <h3>Methods</h3> Two international cohorts of very preterm neonates (n = 143) with prolonged (≥14 days) or restricted (<14 days) use of AL/CVL were scanned serially with MRI. General linear models were used to determine the association between skin breaks and thalamic volumes, accounting for clinical confounders and site differences. Children were assessed at preschool age on standardized tests of motor and cognitive function. Outcome scores were assessed in relation to neonatal thalamic growth. <h3>Results</h3> Prolonged AL/CVL use in neonates (n = 86) was associated with fewer skin breaks (median 34) during the hospital stay compared to restricted AL/CVL use (n = 57, median 91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60.35–84.89). Neonates with prolonged AL/CVL use with fewer skin breaks had significantly larger thalamic volumes early in life compared to neonates with restricted line use (B = 121.8, <i>p</i> = 0.001, 95% CI 48.48–195.11). Neonatal thalamic growth predicted preschool-age cognitive (B = 0.001, 95% CI 0.0003–0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and motor scores (B = 0.01, 95% CI 0.001–0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Prolonged AL/CVL use was not associated with greater incidence of sepsis or multiple infections. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Prolonged AL/CVL use in preterm neonates may provide an unprecedented opportunity to reduce invasive procedures in preterm neonates. Pain reduction in very preterm neonates is associated with optimal thalamic growth and neurodevelopment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".