"History of Yamini" As a Source of History of Central Asia: An Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A work of Abu Nasr al-Utbi "Tarikh-i al-Yamini" (History of Yamini) is an important source in the study of the history of Central Asia during the Ghaznavid period, in particular, Khorezm, Bukhara, Samarkand, Termez, Nasaf, Shash and the foundations of statehood in our country in the X-XI centuries. The work "Tarikh-i al-Yamini" has not been sufficiently studied and has not translated into Uzbek yet. Through this information, the researcher gets acquainted with the social processes that took place in Transoxiana, Khorasan, Kashmir in the first quarter of the X and XI centuries, the culture of the peoples, international relations in these countries. The work continues the events that took place after the "Tarikh-i al-Tabari" (History of Tabari). The work complements the information of the scholars like as Narshahi, Abu Rayhan Beruni, Saalibi about these periods. "History of Yamini" covers in detail the political events that took place in Transoxiana and Khorasan during the last Samanid period. It tells the story of the end of the X century and the first quarter of the XI century in connection with the history of Transoxiana and Khorasan. There is a certain kindness to the rulers as in all historical works of that period. The work of al-Utbi also reflects the battles for the thrones, wealth, power struggles, conflicts, bloodshed and various conflicts between the ruling powers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".