S3081 The Common Clinical Manifestations and Interventions for Post-Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Related Adverse Events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in surgical technique in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), postoperative morbidity is still present 30-40% of the time. Thus, as the indications for pancreatic resection have broadened, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become essential in the management of post-PD-related adverse events (AE). In this study, we characterized the common clinical manifestations and interventions performed for post-PD-related AEs. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with prior classic or pylorus-preserving PD who received ERCP from 01/13/06 - 01/16/19. The pertinent demographic information, oncologic history, and follow-up information were extracted. Outcomes included technical success rate - the ability to treat stricture with dilation or stent placement, and clinical success rate - a documented decrease in bilirubin to normal or 50% of peak value within 2 weeks. Statistical analysis was done using Stata/SE version 16.0. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (75% male; median age 66 years, range 22-86 years) with prior PD received 66 ERCPs for choledochojejunostomy (25 patients received 63 ERCPs) and pancreaticojejunostomy (3 patients received 3 ERCPs) evaluation. All 3 ERCPs for pancreatic assessment were unsuccessful. PD was most commonly performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 15) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 5) [Table 1]. A total of 11 patients received neoadjuvant therapy: 8 had chemoradiation, 3 had chemotherapy only. Most cases were performed with an advanced fellow and had a median duration of 56.5 min (range 12.0-161.0). The most common indications for initial ERCP were cholangitis (n = 15) and biliary obstruction without cholangitis (n = 7). An additional 38 ERCPs were necessary in 9 patients (median 4 ERCPs/patient; range 2-13/patient) most commonly for cholangitis (n = 17) and biliary stricture (n = 10) [Table 2]. All strictures were treated with balloon dilation and a total of 38 stents were placed. The technical success rate was 81.0% (51/63 ERCPs) and the clinical success rate was 76.2% (48/63 ERCPs). Procedure-related-AEs occurred in 5/66 ERCPs (7.6%): 4 cases of self-resolving fever, 1 case of mild cholangitis. CONCLUSION: Patients with prior PD commonly require routine ERCP for the management of postoperative AEs. ERCP is an effective and safe treatment modality for post-PD-related hepatobiliary sequela, but improvements are necessary for pancreatic intervention.Table 1Table 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".