MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S0246 Anal Cancer: Overview of Hospitalizations, Healthcare Utilization, and Outcomes from the Inpatient World

2020· article· en· W3094594923 on OpenAlexaff
Raja Chandra Chakinala, Khwaja F. Haq, Shantanu Solanki, Asim Kichloo, Harshil Shah, Jagmeet Singh, Achint Patel, Abhishek Bhurwal, Shanza Waqar, Zarak Khan, Faiza Bhatti

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnal cancerDemographyCancerMalignancyHealth careHealthcare Cost and Utilization ProjectEpidemiologyColorectal cancerDiagnosis codeAnal canalPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicinePopulationEnvironmental healthRectum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Anal cancer is an uncommon type of gastrointestinal malignancy that occurs in the anal canal and potentially cause signs and symptoms such as rectal bleeding and anal pain. Limited epidemiological data exist on cost of care and outcomes for hospitalizations with anal cancer. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was analyzed during the period from 2001 to 2011 for all subjects with the diagnosis of anal cancer (ICD-9 code 154.3) as primary or secondary diagnosis. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is the largest inpatient care database in the United States. Its large sample size is ideal for developing national and regional estimates. Cochran-Armitage trend test was used for determining statistical significance of variation. RESULTS: In 2001, there were 2,943 hospitalizations with anal cancer as compared to 5,587 in 2011 (P < 0.0001, Figure 1A). Age group 50–64 remained the most commonly affected with rising proportional trend from 32.5% in 2001 to 41.0% in 2011 (P < 0.0001, Figure 1B). Throughout the study period, more women (about two thirds each year) were hospitalized with anal cancer as compared to men (P < 0.0001, Figure 1C). Caucasians remained the most commonly affected race with a slight decrease in proportional trend from 78.4% in 2001 to 74.5% in 2011 (P < 0.0001). Southern US remained to have more anal cancer-related hospitalizations as compared to other regions, however, over the study period there was a decline in hospitalization rate from 44.7% in 2001 to 38.8% in 2011 (P < 0.0001). In- hospital mortality decreased from 3.2% in 2001 to 2.7% in 2011 (P < 0.0001) and average length of stay increased from 6.5 days in 2001 to 7.4 days in 2011 (P = 0.63). Cost per hospitalization increased from $10,749 in 2001 to $15,394 in 2011 (adjusted for inflation, P < 0.0001, Figure 1D). Analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) comorbidity measures revealed hypertension, fluid & electrolyte disorders, and deficiency anemias as some of the more commonly associated comorbidities with metastatic cancer showing increasing association over time (Figure 2).Figure 1Figure 2CONCLUSION: Significant rise in the number of hospitalizations with anal cancer was found with interesting demographic variations and association with comorbidities. Although in-hospital mortality decreased, there was a noteworthy rise in the cost of care. Further studies are needed to identify potential predictors & factors responsible for such results to better elucidate our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207