MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094608193 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.61929

<scp><i>MEIS2</i></scp> sequence variant in a child with intellectual disability and cardiac defects: Expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and documentation of <scp>low‐level</scp> mosaicism in an unaffected parent

2020· article· en· W3094608193 on OpenAlexaff
Julia X. Su, Lea Velsher, Jane Juusola, Marjan M. Nezarati

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoNorth York General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbandIntellectual disabilityBiologyGeneticsExome sequencingPhenotypeGeneMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deletions and pathogenic sequence variants in Myeloid Ecotropic Insertion Site 2 (MEIS2) gene have been reported to cause a recognizable triad of intellectual disability, congenital heart malformations, and palatal defects. To date, 18 individuals with de novo pathogenic sequence variants in MEIS2 have been reported in the literature, most with all three cardinal features. We recently saw a young boy, almost 3 years of age, who was known to have mosaic XYY syndrome (47,XYY [23]/46,XY[7]). He presented with atrial and ventricular septal defects, developmental delay, facial dysmorphism, gastroesophageal reflux, undescended testicle, a buried penis with penoscrotal transposition, primary neutropenia, and a branchial cleft sinus. Whole-exome sequencing identified a previously reported in-frame pathogenic deletion (c.998_1000delGAA; p.R333del; NM_170674.4) in MEIS2. His unaffected father was confirmed to have low-level mosaicism for the same MEIS2 variant. The proband represents the 19th reported individual with a pathogenic sequence variant in MEIS2 and expands the phenotypic spectrum to include primary neutropenia, branchial anomalies, and complex genital anomalies. Furthermore, to our knowledge this is the first reported case of mosaicism for a variant in this gene in an apparently unaffected parent. This finding would have implications for recurrence risk counseling for families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207