MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094615079 · doi:10.1002/bip.23405

<scp>6‐phenylpyrrolocytosine</scp> as a fluorescent probe to examine nucleotide flipping catalyzed by a <scp>DNA</scp> repair protein

2020· article· en· W3094615079 on OpenAlexaff
Delshanee Kotandeniya, Melanie S. Rogers, Jenna Fernandez, Sreenivas Kanugula, Robert H. E. Hudson, Freddys Rodriguez, John D. Lipscomb, Natalia Tretyakova

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsChemistryDNAGuanineGuanosineNucleotideBase pairAdductCytosineMolecular biologyBiochemistryFluorescenceDNA repairStereochemistryBiophysicsGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellular exposure to tobacco‐specific nitrosamines causes formation of promutagenic O6‐[4‐oxo‐4‐(3‐pyridyl)but‐1‐yl]guanine (O6‐POB‐G) and O6‐methylguanine (O6‐Me‐G) adducts in DNA. These adducts can be directly repaired by O6‐alkylguanine‐DNA alkyltransferase (AGT). Repair begins by flipping the damaged base out of the DNA helix. AGT binding and base‐flipping have been previously studied using pyrrolocytosine as a fluorescent probe paired to the O6‐alkylguanine lesion, but low fluorescence yield limited the resolution of steps in the repair process. Here, we utilize the highly fluorescent 6‐phenylpyrrolo‐2′‐deoxycytidine (6‐phenylpyrrolo‐C) to investigate AGT‐DNA interactions. Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide duplexes containing O6‐POB‐G and O6‐Me‐G adducts were placed within the CpG sites of codons 158, 245, and 248 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and base‐paired to 6‐phenylpyrrolo‐C in the opposite strand. Neighboring cytosine was either unmethylated or methylated. Stopped‐flow fluorescence measurements were performed by mixing the DNA duplexes with C145A or R128G AGT variants. We observe a rapid, two‐step, nearly irreversible binding of AGT to DNA followed by two slower steps, one of which is base‐flipping. Placing 5‐methylcytosine immediately 5′ to the alkylated guanosine causes a reduction in rate constant of nucleotide flipping. O6‐POB‐G at codon 158 decreased the base flipping rate constant by 3.5‐fold compared with O6‐Me‐G at the same position. A similar effect was not observed at other codons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207