MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094679970 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-137650

Cite-Seq Profiling of T Cells in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing BCMA Targeting CAR-T or Bites Immunotherapy

2020· article· en· W3094679970 on OpenAlexaff
Noémie Leblay, Ranjan Maity, Elie Barakat, Sylvia McCulloch, Peter Duggan, Víctor H. Jiménez‐Zepeda, Nizar J. Bahlis, Paola Neri

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowT cellImmunologyCD8Immune systemImmunotherapyAntigenPeripheral blood mononuclear cellCell therapyMedicineCD19BiologyCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive T cell therapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) have demonstrated encouraging responses in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the cellular and molecular predictors of clinical response are not fully understood as well as the mediators of acquired resistance remain elusive. Local immune suppression and T cell exhaustion are important mediators of responses therefore, it is plausible to speculate that a tolerant tumor microenvironment and the expansion of specific T cell populations may dictate clinical responses. In this study, we performed at the single cell level a broad immunophenotypic and transcriptomic characterization of the blood and bone marrow (BM) T cells of sensitive and resistant MM patients treated with adaptive T cell therapies. Using cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) we measured the expansion of variable T cell subsets, T cell specific activation and inhibitor markers and their functional states in order to identify cellular mediators of resistance to these adoptive immune therapies. Serial blood samples and BM aspirates (n=12) were collected from patients treated with anti-BCMA CAR-T or BCMA-CD3 BiTEs at variable time points, prior and post initiation of therapy and at relapse. Bone marrow mononuclear fractions were isolated through ficoll density gradients coupled with magnetic sorting of CD3pos T cells. Unbiased mRNA profiling coupled with feature barcoding technology for cell surface protein (TotalSeq-B) of BM CD3pos T cells was then performed by using the chromium single cell (10x Genomics). Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina platform. Cell Ranger and Seurat pipeline were used for sample de-multiplexing, barcode processing, single-cell 3′ gene counting, cell surface protein expression and data analysis. CAR-T cells were identified by the expression of the chimeric CAR-T cell transcript. The parallel measurement of transcripts and cell surface protein phenotypes of CD3pos T cells using a panel of 19 immune surface markers underlined the T cell repertoire diversity and identified different T cell subsets among the CD8pos and CD4pos T cells. Notably, the cell surface protein information overlaid on the transcript-generated UMA allowed accurate identification of all main immune clusters, in particular for the CD45RA and CD45RO positive cells. Comparison of CITE-Seq features revealed that the T cells composition of the blood and BM niches differed significantly between sensitive and resistant patients. As such an enrichment of CD4pos T cells with a higher CD4:CD8 ratio was noted in responding patients. Phenotypic (CD45RA, CD45RO, CD95, CCR7, CD62L, CD28, CD27) and transcriptional signatures (TCF7, LEF1, GATA3, EOMES, TBX21, PRDM1) also identified a higher proportion of memory like T cells (Tscm, Tcm) in responding patients. In contrast, T cells of resistant patients were enriched with terminally exhausted (Tex) and senescent cells with loss of CD28, high GMZHand GMZB, CD57pos, CD69pos and CD160pos as well as upregulation of TBX21. Expression of T cell checkpoint inhibitors such as LAG3, TIGIT and PD1 was high in these Tex cells as well as in some Tem. Of note, ex vivo T cell activation studies with TIGIT blockade demonstrated T cell activation in an autologous MM and T cell co-culture system with enhanced MM cells death. An expanded cluster of regulatory T cells (Treg) FOXP3pos,CD25pos was also observed in two resistant patients. Of note, no loss of BCMA transcript or surface expression was noted in MM cells at the time of acquired resistance. Single cell transcriptome of primary MM cells and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) analyses of T cells of these patients are ongoing to investigate the transcriptional programs and epigenetic factors underlying the immune escape. Combined single cell features profiling of the transcriptome and surface protein expression of T cells from MM patients receiving BCMA targeted CAR-T or BiTEs therapies revealed potential mediators of resistance. In particular, T cells composition (low CD4:CD8 ratio and reduced population of Tscm, Tcm) along with an enrichment of terminally exhausted T cells are the main features observed in resistant patients. Delineating these mechanisms will guide future T cells engineering studies to enhance the efficacy and response durability of adoptive immunotherapy in MM. Disclosures McCulloch: Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Duggan:Jannsen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Jimenez-Zepeda:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Bahlis:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene and Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Neri:Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207