تطویر المجالس المدرسیة بمرحلة التعلیم الأساسى فى مصر على ضوء خبرة انجلترا
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of reference, the historical dimension of boards of trustees, and the principles and foundations upon which these councils are based.The third chapter: The councils of trustees and teachers in England, Germany and Canada, in terms of education management and financing, origin and development, goals and specialties, financial affairs, achievements, and evaluation of the boards of trustees and teachers in the three countries England, Germany and Canada.In the fourth chapter: The reality of the boards of trustees and teachers in Egypt is covered in terms of concept, origin, goals, composition, terms of reference of boards of trustees and teachers, achievements and evaluation.The fifth chapter: deals with: a comparative analysis of the boards of trustees and teachers between England, Germany, Canada and the Arab Republic of Egypt in the light of the forces and factors affecting each of them.The comparative analysis included all the axes that were addressed to the boards of trustees and teachers through the four countries.As for the sixth chapter: it is a proposed concept for the development of the boards of trustees and teachers in the schools of the second cycle of basic education in the Arab Republic of Egypt.This chapter included the principles of the proposed vision and its objectives, its features, procedures and requirements for the proposed vision
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".