MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095173492 · doi:10.1101/2020.10.29.20222679

A Novel 3-Dimensional technique in measuring pericoronary epicardial adipose tissue radiodensity

2020· preprint· en· W3095173492 on OpenAlexaff
Lingyu Xu, Stanislau Hrybouski, Yuancheng Xu, Richard Coulden, Emer Sonnex, D. Ian Paterson, Craig Butler

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiodensityHounsfield scaleReproducibilitySegmentationMedicineAdipose tissueNuclear medicineRadiologyComputed tomographyComputer scienceMathematicsRadiographyArtificial intelligenceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to investigate a novel semi-automated three-dimensional (3D) quantification of the pericoronary epicardial adipose tissue radiodensity (PCATrd). Methods Twenty-four subjects who previously underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac CT scans were retrospectively identified. The PCATrd was measured in ITK-SNAP imaging software using a Hounsfield unit threshold (−190,-3) to define epicardial adipose tissue (EAT). A spherical 3D brush tool was used on multiplanar reformatted images to segment the PCAT. We defined the PCATrd as EAT within the orthogonal distance from the coronary artery (CA) outer wall equal to the diameter of the corresponding CA segment. The segmentation followed the path of major CAs. Additionally, the PCAT of twenty-five calcified segments were segmented. Reliability of this novel segmentation protocol was assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) and intraclass coefficient (ICC). Results The segmentation reproducibility for the PCAT was high, with intraobserver DSC 0.86±0.04 for the full length of major CAs and 0.85±0.07 for the calcified segments, and interobserver DSC 0.84±0.04 for the full length of major CAs and 0.83±0.05 for the calcified segments. The reproducibility of the PCATrd value assessed by ICC was also excellent, with intraobserver ICC 0.99 for the full length of major CAs and 0.99 for the calcified segments, and interobserver ICC 0.99 for the full length of major CAs and 0.99 for the calcified segments. Conclusions Our novel 3D PCATrd quantification technique is reliable and reproducible. The availability of the open source software and detailed image analysis pipeline will enable reliable replications and broad uptake of our technique. Key points We have produced a novel, semiautomated technique to comprehensively quantify pericoronary epicardial adipose tissue radiodensity (PCATrd) which is a novel imaging biomarker of coronary inflammation. Our method of PCAT segmentation has excellent reproducibility. We use open source software and provide detailed image analysis pipeline of quantifying PCATrd, which will allow easy replication and broad uptake of our technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207