A Clinicopathologic Study of Movement Disorders in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the considerable overlap with atypical parkinsonism, a systematic characterization of the movement disorders associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of the phenomenology and neuropathologic correlations of movement disorders in FTLD. METHODS: In this cohort study, movement disorder clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records of consecutive patients with a postmortem diagnosis of FTLD from the Queen Square Brain Bank between January 2010 and December 2018. At postmortem, neurodegenerative pathologies were systematically evaluated following consensus criteria. Degeneration of the substantia nigra was assessed as a marker of presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism using semiquantitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (35 men [64%]) were included with median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis of 58.8 (52.6-63.9) years and a disease duration of 9.6 (6.2-12.9) years. Movement disorders were present in 19 (35%) patients without differences among disease subtypes. The most common syndromes were parkinsonism (9 patients [16%]), usually as an additional late feature, and corticobasal syndrome (CBS, 7 patients [13%]), commonly as a presenting feature. Substantia nigra degeneration was present in 37 (67%) patients although it did not show a good clinical correlation with movement disorders. Those with Pick's disease showed milder substantia nigra degeneration and better response to levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: Movement disorders can present in all FTLD subtypes, more commonly as a late additional feature (parkinsonism) or as a presenting symptom (CBS). The underlying pathophysiology is complex and likely to involve structures outside the presynaptic striatonigral system. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".