MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095305286 · doi:10.1089/gtmb.2020.0063

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Roles of the Expression Levels of the Programmed Cell Death-1 Gene in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020· review· en· W3095305286 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Yang, Wenguang Zhang, Zhimei Zhang, Fusheng Song, Min Ding, Xiaoling Zhao, Wei Wang, Yuqiong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazard ratioMedicineConfidence intervalHepatocellular carcinomaInternal medicineMeta-analysisOdds ratioOncologyGastroenterologyPublication bias

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Multiple studies have explored the prognostic role and clinical significance of the expression of the programmed cell death-1 ( PD-1 ) gene in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results have been inconsistent. This study evaluated PD-1 expression and its clinical significance in patients with HCC, as well as the correlation between HCC pathological features and prognoses. Methods: All related research in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science prior to October 31, 2019, was retrieved. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. Stata 14.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data, and the correlations between PD-1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients were analyzed using the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% CI were used to analyze the correlation between PD-1 high expression and patient prognosis. Begg's test was used to evaluate publication bias. Results: A total of 581 patients were analyzed in the six studies included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that high levels of PD-1 expression did not correlate with overall survival (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: [0.41-1.54]; p = 0.493). PD-1 positivity was associated with better disease-free survival (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: [0.38-0.72]; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, elevated PD-1 expression corrected for age (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: [0.41-0.96]; p = 0.030) and alpha-fetoprotein levels (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: [1.46-3.55]; p < 0.0001), were not correlated with patient sex, tumor size, tumor multiplicity, hepatitis B virus history, tumor node metastasis stage or Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage. Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed that PD-1 expression may be a useful prognostic marker in HCC patients. Prospective clinical studies are needed to support these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.023
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetic Testing and Molecular BiomarkersSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207