Disinhibited social engagement behaviors in young maltreated children: Dysfunctional behavior of biological parents and child attachment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies on children with disinhibited social engagement behavior (DSEB) and their caregivers have primarily been limited to institution-reared children. Using a sample of intact parent-child dyads, the current study examined the distinct contributions of dysfunctional (disconnected/extremely insensitive) parental behaviors and type of maltreatment on maltreated children’s levels of DSEB. Child time in foster care and quality of attachment to caregiver were taken in account. The sample comprised 67 children (1–5 years old) and their biological parent with substantiated maltreatment and recruited through child protective services between the years of 2008 and 2012. Observations of parent-child interactions were collected and child CPS files were consulted. Results indicate that very few children (4%), in this predominantly neglected sample (79 %), showed high levels of DSEB. Levels of socioeconomic risks, child age, child sex, time in placement, or attachment to caregiver were not significantly related to DSEB. The vast majority of the children developed an insecure attachment to their parent (76 %), especially of the disorganized type (51 %). Finally, beyond neglect, which was no longer associated with DSEB in the final model, we found that the more the parent showed disconnected and extremely insensitive behavior (R2 = .10), in particular withdrawn behavior, the more the children exhibited DSEB. Albeit of a small magnitude, we suggest that the quality of parental behavior could play a role in children’s development and recovery of DSEB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".