To the issue on the capacity building for internationalization of higher technical education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internationalization of education creates new opportunities for higher education institutions, increases the availability and implementation of innovative methods in higher education systems. The article covers the development of the internationalization potential of higher technical education.Current study was carried out as part of the project «Development of the potential of internationalization of a technical university through digital learning technologies», approved by priority «Scientific Foundations of Mingilik El (21st Century Education, Fundamental and Applied Studies in the Humanities)» on grant funding for young scientists in the years 2020 to 2022.The author defined the concept of «internationalization», presented the purpose, scientific methods and potential of the project, examined the main directions of development of this process in the framework of the experience in Nazarbayev University, Canadian and Russian experience in constructing the framework for conceptualizing the development of internationalization.The initial analysis of the studied works on the internationalization of higher education showed problems in the results of the international activity of national and foreign practice and the lack of work to build the capacity of internationalization of technical universities.Much interest had been generated from the research on globalization and the internationalization of higher education through the prism of computer technology, which have proved to be a limited number.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".