MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095455191 · doi:10.1021/acsami.0c14220

Fabrication of a Self-Healing, 3D Printable, and Reprocessable Biobased Elastomer

2020· article· en· W3095455191 on OpenAlexafffund
Saadman Sakib Rahman, Muhammad Arshad, Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Aman Ullah

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Canola Producers CommissionAlberta Innovates
KeywordsElastomerMaterials scienceCompression moldingComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthPolymerCompression setMonomerNatural rubber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel self-healable, fully reprocessable, and inkjet three-dimensional (3D) printable partially biobased elastomer is reported in this work. A long-chain unsaturated diacrylate monomer was first synthesized from canola oil and then cross-linked with a partially oxidized silicon-based copolymer containing free thiol groups and disulfide bonds. The elastomer is fabricated through inkjet 3D printing utilizing the photoinitiated thiol-ene click chemistry and reprocessed by compression molding exploiting the dynamic nature of disulfide bond. Self-healing is enabled by phosphine-catalyzed disulfide metathesis. The elastomer displayed a tensile strength of ∼52 kPa, a breaking strain of ∼24, and ∼86% healing efficiency at 80 °C temperature after 8 h. Moreover, the elastomer showed excellent thermal stability, and the highest thermal degradation temperature was recorded to be ∼524 °C. After reprocessing through compression molding, the elastomer fully recovered its mechanical and thermal properties. These properties of the elastomer yield an ecofriendly alternative of fossil fuel-based elastomers that can find broad applications in soft robotics, flexible wearable devices, strain sensors, health care, and next-generation energy-harvesting and -storage devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207