MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095464641 · doi:10.1002/cjp2.188

<scp>SWI</scp>/<scp>SNF</scp>‐deficiency defines highly aggressive undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

2020· article· en· W3095464641 on OpenAlex
Basile Tessier‐Cloutier, Mackenzie Coatham, Mark Carey, Gregg Nelson, Sarah Hamilton, Amy Lum, Robert A. Soslow, Colin J.R. Stewart, Lynne‐Marie Postovit, Martin Köbel, Cheng‐Han Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology Clinical Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alexandra HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BCCalgary Laboratory ServicesBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCalgary Laboratory Services
KeywordsSMARCB1SMARCA4SWI/SNFARID1AMedicineCancer researchPathologyBiologyMutationGeneGeneticsTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dedifferentiated/undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC/UEC) is an endometrial cancer characterized by the presence of histologically undifferentiated carcinoma. Genomic inactivation of core switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complex proteins was recently identified in approximately two-thirds of DDEC/UEC. The aim of this study was to delineate the clinical behavior of SWI/SNF-deficient DDEC/UEC in comparison to SWI/SNF-intact DDEC/UEC. The study cohort consisted of 56 SWI/SNF-deficient DDEC/UEC (2 POLE-mutated), which showed either SMARCA4 (BRG1) loss, ARID1A/1B co-loss, or SMARCB1 (INI1) loss in the undifferentiated tumor, and 26 SWI/SNF-intact DDEC/UEC (4 POLE-mutated). The average age at diagnosis was 61 years for patients with SWI/SNF-deficient tumors and 64 years for SWI/SNF-intact tumors. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency was seen in 66% of SWI/SNF-deficient and 50% of SWI/SNF-intact tumors. At initial presentation, 55% of patients with SWI/SNF-deficient tumors had extrauterine disease spread in contrast to 38% of patients with SWI/SNF-intact tumors. The 2-year disease specific survival (DSS) for stages I and II disease was 65% for SWI/SNF deficient tumors relative to 100% for SWI/SNF-intact tumors (p = 0.042). For patients with stages III and IV disease, the median survival was 4 months for SWI/SNF-deficient tumors compared to 36 months for SWI/SNF-intact tumors (p = 0.0003). All six patients with POLE-mutated tumors, including one with stage IV SWI/SNF-deficient tumor were alive with no evidence of disease. Among the patients with advanced stage SWI/SNF-deficient tumors, 68% (21 of 31) received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (platinum/taxane-based) and all except the patient with a POLE-mutated tumor (20 of 21) experienced disease progression either during chemotherapy or within 4 months after its completion. These findings show that core SWI/SNF-deficiency defines a highly aggressive group of undifferentiated cancer characterized by rapid disease progression that is refractory to conventional platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. This underscores the importance of accurate clinical recognition of this aggressive tumor and the need to consider alternative systemic therapy for these tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it