Bone and joint enhancement filtering: Application to proximal femur segmentation from uncalibrated computed tomography datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods for reliable femur segmentation enable the execution of quality retrospective studies and building of robust screening tools for bone and joint disease. An enhance-and-segment pipeline is proposed for proximal femur segmentation from computed tomography datasets. The filter is based on a scale-space model of cortical bone with properties including edge localization, invariance to density calibration, rotation invariance, and stability to noise. The filter is integrated with a graph cut segmentation technique guided through user provided sparse labels for rapid segmentation. Analysis is performed on 20 independent femurs. Rater proximal femur segmentation agreement was 0.21 mm (average surface distance), 0.98 (Dice similarity coefficient), and 2.34 mm (Hausdorff distance). Manual segmentation added considerable variability to measured failure load and volume (CVRMS > 5%) but not density. The proposed algorithm considerably improved inter-rater reproducibility for all three outcomes (CVRMS < 0.5%). The algorithm localized the periosteal surface accurately compared to manual segmentation but with a slight bias towards a smaller volume. Hessian-based filtering and graph cut segmentation localizes the periosteal surface of the proximal femur with comparable accuracy and improved precision compared to manual segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".