MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3095604609 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-143155

A Novel VWD Variant Identified in a Multi-Generational Canadian Ojibway Kindred with a Type 2B VWD Phenotypic Expression

2020· article· en· W3095604609 on OpenAlexaffabout
Neelan Sriranjan, Donald S. Houston, Sara J. Israels, Emily Rimmer, Tracy Nacionales, Tracy Voth

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand factorVon Willebrand diseaseRistocetinGeneticsMissense mutationCompound heterozygosityPhenotypeBleeding diathesisHemostasisImmunologyPlateletMedicineBiologyGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Type 2 VWD is caused by variants in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene leading to impaired function. Distinction between subtypes of Type 2 has traditionally relied on a panel of assays including VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin-cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF multimers, and Factor VIII (FVIII:C). In type 2A, there is either impaired synthesis or accelerated degradation of the more adhesive VWF high molecular weight multimers (HMWMs). In type 2B, enhanced VWF-platelet interactions result in binding and removal of the HMWMs, impairing platelet adhesion. Type 2B VWD can manifest spontaneous platelet agglutination and thrombocytopenia. The inheritance patterns of Type 2A and 2B VWD are generally described to be autosomal dominant and fully penetrant. We identified a multigenerational Canadian First Nations Ojibway kindred with VWD harboring a missense variant in exon 28 (A>T transversion at nucleotide 4898), leading to a single amino acid substitution (p.Asn1633Ile). Some individuals in the kindred are heterozygous, and some homozygous, for the causative variant. Objectives: The objective of this case series are to describe the genetic basis and pattern of inheritance of this variant of VWD, and to characterize the laboratory hemostasis characteristics in the affected individuals. Methods: A retrospective case review was conducted on all affected individuals in the kindred known or suspected to harbour this variant. There were 20 individuals seen at our centre over 32 years who were included in this study. We collected clinical and laboratory data to characterize the bleeding phenotype. Results: Sixteen of the 20 individuals in the study were known or inferred to be heterozygous, and 4 were homozygous. We were able to examine laboratory hemostasis in ten individuals in the study (Table 1). The platelet count, FVIII:C and VWF:Ag levels were within or slightly above reference range for all individuals. In the heterozygous individuals, VWF:RCo was mildly reduced, VWF multimer testing showed loss of HMWMs, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) testing normal aggregation to a higher dose (1.25 mg/ml), a pattern consistent with mild Type 2A VWD (Table 1). In homozygous individuals, VWF:RCo was markedly reduced, and while RIPA was minimal with low-dose ristocetin, aggregation to the higher dose was normal despite the very low ristocetin cofactor activity in the plasma. The PFA-100 (collagen-epinephrine) closure times were markedly prolonged in the homozygous subjects and in one heterozygous subject, exceeding 300 seconds. Discussion/Conclusion: This novel VWF variant confers a laboratory phenotype consistent with type 2A VWD in the heterozygotes. Homozygotes have more severely impaired hemostatic function. The conventional hallmark of type 2B VWD (hyperresponsiveness to low-dose ristocetin) was not seen, but the fact that full aggregation was obtained in homozygotes despite ristocetin cofactor activities of only 5-6% in the plasma suggests some degree of hyperaggregability, and hence a phenotype more in keeping with Type 2B than 2A. In the future, it would be interesting to see how this missense variant affects GP1b binding to VWF, as RIPA and VWF:RCo are not entirely comparable assays. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→