Optic Disc Cupping Due to Dolichoectatic Internal Carotid Artery Optic Nerve Compression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine whether significant compression of the optic nerve by the internal carotid artery (ICA) can produce an optic neuropathy with optic disc cupping that resembles glaucoma in patients without elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology for a possible nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy. Patients were included in the study if they had preserved visual acuity, optic disc-related visual field defects, optic nerve cupping, IOP less than 21 mm Hg, open angles, and unequivocal radiological compression of the ipsilateral optic nerve by an intracranial blood vessel. RESULTS: Three patients were included with a mean age of 56.3 (range 29-82) years. Patient 1 was a 58-year-old man incidentally noted to have left optic nerve cupping on a routine examination. He had an inferior arcuate defect and the left prechiasmatic optic nerve was elevated and compressed by a tortuous left ICA. Patient 2 was a 29-year-old man with a normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnosis for 7 years in the right eye treated with latanoprost. He had a superior greater than inferior arcuate defect and there was vascular compression of the optic nerve between the supraclinoid ICA and A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery. Patient 3 was an 82-year-old woman with an NTG diagnosis for 10 years who had progression of her visual field defects despite low IOPs. MRI showed mass effect on the right optic nerve by a dolichoectatic right supraclinoid ICA. CONCLUSIONS: Significant compression of the optic nerve by a normal, tortuous, or dolichoectatic ICA may result in an optic neuropathy with optic disc cupping that resembles glaucoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".